| NEWS |  | | | | | SPORT | | | | FOOD AND WINE | | | | | | WHAT'S ON | | | | NEWS | | |
|
|
|
Plug pulled on boatyard plan
COUNCILLORS won a standing ovation last night when they threw out plans to build flats on the site of an historic Oxford boatyard.
Oxford author Philip Pullman joined scores of campaigners outside Oxford Town Hall before the meeting to urge city councillors to reject the proposals for Castle Mill boatyard in Jericho.
And there was standing room only inside the assembly room as protesters made a series of pleas to protect the site.
Addressing the 150-strong audience, Mr Pullman said: "It displays an arrogance of scale. It will fundamentally alter the whole appearance of the canal in both directions.
"It's like finding a bird's nest and throwing a brick into it."
Protester Simon Norris said: "The proposal dumps two large blocks of flats on this site reminiscent of Soviet housing."
And fellow campaigner Peter Strong added: "It would be like concreting over the entrance to a valuable gold mine."
As well as 54 one and two-bedroom flats, the plans included 16 car parking spaces, a canal winding hole - where boats can turn around - a public square, a lifting bridge and a boat repair berth.
Developers Spring Residential also offered to pay £126,000 towards providing an alternative boatyard in Yarnton.
Members of Oxford City Council's central, south and west area committee unanimously rejected the plans after a two-hour debate.
And they put forward five extra reasons for refusal to the four proposed by council officers - pleasing campaigners who said this would make it harder for the plans to win through on appeal.
These included the lack of an adequate replacement boatyard, the design of the scheme, height of the buildings, damage to the setting of St Barnabas Church and concerns about flooding.
Officers had already recommended the scheme for refusal because it lacked enough affordable and energy efficient housing, did not include enough financial contributions to local services and failed to provide a legal agreement for a new community centre.
Spring Residential's representatives declined to justify the scheme to the meeting and were booed when they left the building after the decision was made.
Jericho and Osney councillor Susanna Pressel said: "It's a very special site and we need to recognise that. Jericho does not need something which is a little monolithic. Jericho deserves better."
Describing the proposed four-storey buildings as "absolutely hideous", councillor Sushila Dhall said: "They are completely out of keeping with anything that's ever been there."
And councillor Bob Price added: "There aren't any merits. The scheme doesn't respect the area and, in architectural terms, would be a real blot on the landscape."
8:27am Wednesday 12th December 2007
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: Terry Hutchinson, oxon on 10:49am Wed 12 Dec 07
At last the voice of reason makes itself heard. Congratulations to all concerned for having the guts to fight for something they believed in
thutch
At last the voice of reason makes itself heard. Congratulations to all concerned for having the guts to fight for something they believed in
thutch
Posted by: Boater, Oxford on 3:39pm Wed 12 Dec 07
So why not allow a boters co-operative to open the boatyard again in the new year until planning permission can be obtained for redevelopment?
Surely that would be the most sensible solution rather than leaving it closed and rotting?
This would allow boaters to do their essential winter maintenance and would improve boat safety in the area.
Its worth noting that the land that the boatyard is on was bequeathed to British Waterways to be used for the benefit of the boating community. I fail to see how blocks of flats can improve this......
Oh, I know - its easier to get planning permission on disused sites, rather than
So why not allow a boters co-operative to open the boatyard again in the new year until planning permission can be obtained for redevelopment?
Surely that would be the most sensible solution rather than leaving it closed and rotting?
This would allow boaters to do their essential winter maintenance and would improve boat safety in the area.
Its worth noting that the land that the boatyard is on was bequeathed to British Waterways to be used for the benefit of the boating community. I fail to see how blocks of flats can improve this......
Oh, I know - its easier to get planning permission on disused sites, rather than
Posted by: julian on 6:28pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Sadly money usually gets its way in the end, esp with NuLabour in power but hurrah today for a victory for the community.
Sadly money usually gets its way in the end, esp with NuLabour in power but hurrah today for a victory for the community.
Posted by: Julius Smit, Banbury on 3:03pm Fri 14 Dec 07
I signed a petition for this, in Oxford, when I was a householder. Little did I know then that I would be now reading this wonderful news as a liveaboard on a canal narrowboat. Congratulations to all concerned!
I signed a petition for this, in Oxford, when I was a householder. Little did I know then that I would be now reading this wonderful news as a liveaboard on a canal narrowboat. Congratulations to all concerned!
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
