Home
Headlines
Picture galleries
National News
National Video News
Floods
Travel latest
Leader
Letters
Elections 2008
Send us your pictures and videos
Features
Entertainment News
Video
Podcasts
Weather
Changing with the Times
Poppy Appeal 2007
Obituaries
Abingdon
Banbury
Bicester
Didcot
Wallingford
Wantage
Witney
Gray Matter
GCSE Tables
A Level Tables
Councillor expenses
Links
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Gray Matter
EDITOR'S CHOICE
OXFORD UNITED
NEWS
Postal sorting to move to Swindon
WHAT'S ON
Born in a Barn preview: Oxford Contemporary Music
Educating Agnes
EATING OUT
Quod Restaurant, the Old Bank Hotel, High Street, Oxford
FOOD AND WINE
Rhubarb wine recipe
NEWS
Leader brands pool queues 'unacceptable'
VOTE
Should the city council hand management of leisure facilities like Hinksey Pool to an outside organisation?
Yes
No
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
MONKEYING WITH THE LANGUAGE

No journalist on a so-called quality newspaper would ever write 'shapeing', 'tapeing', 'gapeing' or 'rapeing'. And yet twice in recent months I have seen the use of the non-word apeing'.

The first time was in a feature in the Independent by Robert Fisk where his 'apeing' was unfortunaly picked out in a standfirst; the other came from the Guardian in the headline to a piece about a follow-up to Cadbury's Gorilla TV commercial.

In both cases, the sub-editor presumably believed 'apeing' to be an acceptable alternative to 'aping' in the way, say, that 'ageing' is to 'aging'. It is not. The error is no doubt accounted for in the failures of modern education (harrumph, harrumph!).

The Spectator, meanwhile, was guilty in last week's edition of a mistake which I consider as reprehensible as the greengrocers' apostrophe. In an interview with RSC artistic director Michael Boyd, Mary Wakefield used ''til' as an alternative to 'until'. This arises from the ignorant assumption that this is how one spells the word 'till' - which is generally favoured over 'until' by the best writers.

I had dinner on Sunday night (Gee's - excellent) with David Crystal, widely acknowledged as Britain's greatest expert on English usage. He told me that this was a classic instance of 'hypercorrection', in which a person tries to avoid making an error in the use of language but overcompensates and in so doing makes another error. So now you know . . .

10:25am Thursday 10th April 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
Oxford United
Visit our new section dedicated to news and features on the U's
Reader Holidays
Exclusive to this site and are not available on the high street
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network