News RSS Feed


Plan unveiled to beat water shortages

8:40am Wednesday 7th May 2008

comment Comments (13)   Have your say »


MEASURES to increase the use of water meters, cut leaks and improve water efficiency have been unveiled as part of plans by Thames Water to prevent severe shortages in the future.

The plans are among a package of proposals for delivering water supplies over the 25 years from 2010 in the face of increased pressure from climate change, rising demand and a growing population.

Much of the area covered by the UK's largest water company is classed as "seriously water stressed", with London, Swindon and parts of Oxfordshire particularly at risk, Thames Water said.

With the population of the area estimated to rise from 8.5 million to 9.7 million by 2034/2035, and 24,800 new households each year in London, the company warned new water resources would be needed.

The UK's largest water supplier said demand from household consumption was set to rise steadily, and warned government aims to reduce daily water use to 130 litres per person by 2030 were unlikely to be met in the Thames area. Water use is around 12 litres per day above the national average of 150 litres.

But the company also said recent consultation with its customers had revealed a "strong desire" for the company to focus on water efficiency education and technology.

Thames Water's statutory draft Water Resources Management Plan includes a 10-year programme of targeted household metering to ensure 50% of homes have their own meter by 2015, rising to 80% by 2020. All buildings connected to the mains water supply will be metered by 2020 under the scheme, Thames Water said.

The company said its highest priority was to cut leaks from the water network, particularly in London where it would continue to replace the outdated and leaky Victorian mains pipes. The current programme, running to 2010, will have reduced leakage levels by around a third, and Thames Water said it was planning a further 24% cut by 2020 to around 520 million litres per day. Currently wastage accounts for 30% of demand, the company's plan said.

To meet rising demand, new proposals include a reservoir in Oxfordshire, research into schemes to re-use effluent as a water supply and aquifer storage and recovery in south London in the next decade.

Thames Water said it would be managing the schemes in an integrated way, so that an area where mains replacement was planned could be targeted for installing water meters and promoting efficiency at the same time.


Your Say YourOxford

Clare, Oxford says...
12:32pm Wed 7 May 08

Here's a plan to beat water shortages Thames Water - how's about you fix some of the leaks and stop losing thousands of gallons of water every day???

A., Wallingford says...
2:33pm Wed 7 May 08

Hi Clare,
Have you actually read the article? If you had, you would have noted that Thames Water make it abundantly clear that they plan to significantly reduce leakage. So why bother posting a comment like the one you posted??
Besides, leakage from water pipes within the Thames valley does not actually deplete the water resource available as the vast majority of our supply comes from groundwater, and when a pipe leaks, the water is simply returned to the chalk aquifer from which it came from in the first place. It does however require more energy to pump it back out of the ground again. Leakage is a popular political target, used by those who have minimal understanding of water resources to pass the blame for their excessive water consumption onto the water companies. You can fix all the leaks you want, but the alarming truth is that it's not going to make a blind bit of difference to the actual resource available. That said, water companies are also guilty of using leakage as political leverage for their own gains when it suits them…

Emma, Down the Drain says...
2:56pm Wed 7 May 08

A Wallingford-

So Thames Water PLAN to reduce wastage? shouldnt they have already tackled it? after all, they have been in charge of the supply for years, and wastage has gone up and up, year on year.

I PLAN to get a Bentley Continental, it doesnt mean it will ever happen though.

Not only does it need pumping out of the ground again once it has leaked, it also needs re-treating, wghich is costly and time consuming.

Leakages is a popular target because it is a major problem. According to Ofwat, Thames Water and United Utilities have failed to meet targets for cutting leaks.

In 2005, Thames lost 915 million litres a day, the regulator said - enough to fill 366 Olympic-sized swimming pools.

Thats 333,975,000,000 litres a year, which is equivalent to a huge body of water, twice the size of the expensive reservoir that Thames Water are planning to build, and also bigger than lake Windermere!!

Of course it would make a difference if this amount of water wasnt being wasted.


Mark Fysh, Whitecross says...
3:14pm Wed 7 May 08

The lame excuses given by Thames Water dont hold water they should put thier own house in order first and not blame the public the problem is that they are more interersted in shareholder dividends than serving customers FIX THE LEAKS do your job first

A., Wallingford says...
3:19pm Wed 7 May 08

Hi Emma, OK, point taken about the PLAN, but I stand by my leakage point. It all depends on your definition of 'wasted'. From a water resource point of view, the water is still there. when you sprinkle the water on your garden, THEN it IS wasted as it will evaporate into the atmosphere. The leaks are (in most cases) below ground and will recharge the aquifer in the same way as effective rainfall would. It will be time consuming and costly to re-treat the water, but then again, so is digging up vast areas of road just to track down a leak the size of pinhole. As scary as it sounds, the 366 olympic-sized swimming pools is still part of the water resource available to us, it has not 'disappeared' and the resource itself has not been 'wasted'. We also know exactly where it is, it is stored ready for use in the aquifer. Preventing that leakage won't actually give us any more water to use, it will just mean that we won't have to pump it out quite as fast. The volumes actually consumed by the consumer will be the same.

Angry, Cowley says...
3:25pm Wed 7 May 08

What winds me up is that they are a monopoly supplier and can just make windfall profits at our expense without us being ever able to question the price we pay or change supplier,they have the nerve to call us customers but how can we be customers if we have no choice? Supposedly privatisation is supposed to bring competition and therefor lower prices, in reality(as with gas and electricity), all that has happened is that a few big players have bought up the companies, continued jacking up prices, not improved either the quality or service to the consumer and made themselves very rich in the process.
I blame Thatcher, she sold all the family silver off and now the majority of Britain is suffering so that the very rich few can continue to make themselves rich.
I hope Thatcher burns in hell for what she has done to Britain.

A., Wallingford says...
3:58pm Wed 7 May 08

Angry, the price we pay for a unit of water is determined by the government, not by the water companies or their share holders. But just to prove that I have not intention of standing up for the water companies (despite my leakage points earlier), what should really make us all angry is the fact that the water companies sold off many of their reservoirs to make a quick profit and are now bleating on about needing to build new reservoirs and reduce consumption. Tackling leakage is a convenient smokescreen that make both the shareholders, customers and watchdogs happy whilst failing to address the real issues...

anon, wallingford says...
4:45pm Wed 7 May 08

A, i'm sorry but you seem to have your wires crossed about the leaks. I used to work for Thames Water and a leak is a leak, there's no such thing as a good leak. Emma is quite correct, water then needs to be pumped out of the ground, retreated and then pumped back into the system.

A., Wallingford says...
5:29pm Wed 7 May 08

Anon of Wallingford, you are quite correct, the water does need to be retreated and pumped back into the system, but you are still missing my point. All that has been wasted in the process of pumping it out for a second time is energy. You have not somehow physically created more water by stopping the leakage, you have merely made its transport from A to B more efficient. The volume of water available as a resource will ALWAYS be the same with or without the leaks, and that is what is becoming increasingly scarce. I am honestly surprised that you did not pick up on this when you worked for Thames Water as I also work within the industry (not a water company though!) and it is a sort of in-joke in our office and others that I deal with. If you had anything to do with water resources you would also know that leakage from pipes is actually factored into the aquifer recharge equations when determining available resources. A good analogy would be trying to eat soup with a fork (well, its getting close to dinner time!). The amount of soup in your bowl will remain the same whether you eat it with a fork or a spoon, only you will have to work twice as hard with the fork. You cannot suddenly feed two people just because you are using a spoon. I suppose after all that, my main point is not to do with whether or not leaks are good or bad, but that they have very little to do with the water shortages that we are facing in the Thames Valley (or anywhere else where groundwater is the main resource).

Frank, Oxford says...
9:39pm Wed 7 May 08

Cut shortages. Plug leaks. Big plan.
Just do it then - off you go!

Anon, Benson says...
9:57pm Wed 7 May 08

Frank, what's the point? Going to all that trouble just so that you can urinate and defecate in water that has been treated and purified to what is probably the best quality tap water in the world? (Which for some reason most people seem to shun for actual drinking purposes in favour of mineral water full of impurities sold at extortionate prices in environmentally unfriendly plastic bottles) Grow up and start taking responsibility for your own actions! That is the only way shortages will go away. Everything is always someone else's fault isn't it?

Fisherman, hanney says...
6:58am Thu 8 May 08

Can,t wait myself to get some decent fishing near wantage

fisherman 2, wantage says...
9:10am Thu 8 May 08

i agree wit u fisherman bout time we had gd place local to catch some more fish bring on the resovoir

Your sayYourOxford

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Oxford Times account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »