News RSS Feed


Academic in rat 'victory'

6:38am Friday 2nd November 2007

comment Comments (12)   Have your say »

By Reg Little »

THAMES Water says it will be undertaking a rat baiting operation in Jericho after using CCTV cameras to investigate claims of an explosion in the local rat population.

The company said the task of baiting sewers in Jericho would be ongoing over months. Oxford City Council are to simultaneously conduct an above ground rat baiting exercise.

Thames Water was called in after complaints from the Oxford academic Dr Frances Kennett, who says that her home in Great Clarendon Street was infested with rats.

Dr Kennett has been involved in a public row with Oxford City Council over months, blaming its introduction of fortnightly waste collections for an increase in the number of rats in the Jericho area.

She welcomed news of the proposed baiting as an important victory for residents.

This week, Thames Water carried out a survey of the sewers under homes in Great Clarendon Street. The company even employed a remote-controlled buggy equipped with CCTV cameras underground.

Don Sharples, of Thames Water, said: "We acknowledge that there is a rodent problem. The council have asked us to assist them in baiting and we have agreed. We are doing everything we have been asked to do to assist council and residents. But it is everyone's responsibility. "

The cameras were sent down to establish whether the rats were escaping into people's homes as a result of damaged pipes. And the company said it was confident that the condition of the Jericho sewers was not to blame for any infested homes.

Mr Sharples said: "We have done a full investigation with CCTV cameras and established that no repairs are required. Our sewers are in good condition.

"But some of the private sewers may be allowing rats to enter properties. Owners may might want to consider how their sewers are connected."

Dr Frances Kennett said she had been vindicated in her view that rat infestation was now a problem affecting large areas of Jericho.

Dr Kennett said the investigation proved that her problems had not resulted from a localised drainage problem, as the city council had been suggesting.

Instead, the experts had confirmed her belief that rats were being drawn from the sewers because of the increased level of waste in Jericho resulting from the alternative weekly collection of household refuse.

She said: "I consider that this is a personal achievement. I have been asking the council for months to get on to Thames Water, without results. Only by holding my ground and continuing the fight has this been achieved."

Dr Kennett said: "Both the Thames Water engineer and the council's rodent officer have proposed that the answer to the problems in Jericho is not my single drainage system, contrary to the ill-informed claims of city councillor Jean Fooks."

She had feared that "the finger was being pointed" at her and a broken drain in order to divert attention from the wider problems resulting from fortnightly waste collections.

The academic said that 25 people had emailed Ratwatch - the group set up to monitor the city's rodent problem.

"Only two of these had called the council. One had been told that as the sighting was on a neighbour's property, the call could not be dealt with.

"The other was told that their complaint would not be 'recorded' until a call-out took place, and that there would be a delay of about two weeks. The other reports were uniformly from people who see no point in contacting the council."

Susanna Pressel, councillor for Osney and Jericho, said: "There are a lot of rat sightings which are not recorded and I am convinced that there are more rats this year above ground than there were last year."

Jean Fooks, the executive member for a cleaner city, said: "I am pleased to hear this news. The evidence shows rat baiting helps control the rat population."


Your Say YourOxford

Dr Julia Gasper, Headington says...
8:23am Fri 2 Nov 07

Where's the victory? Rubbish collections are still only fortnightly and the fact is that the population still throws far too much away. Dr Kennett is quite wrong to blame Oxford City or County Council, when the directives come ultimately from the EU. They are threatening us with massive fines if we don't meet targets for landfill reduction. Dr Kennett does not seem to understand that the Council is under pressure and had to change the system in some way. Maybe getting some of our waste eaten by animals - even rats - would be better than paying the huge fines! The best solution is very simple - leave the EU. Then spend the money we save on restoring our former level of services, including weekly waste collection.

dave, says...
9:31am Fri 2 Nov 07

Maybe we should start taking our rubbish to the city coucil offices, dumping it in their reception area. Perhaps then they might decide to collect our normal waste on a weekly basis. Im all for recycling but normal waste should be collected every week. I totally sympathise with anyone in jericho who has problems with rats.

I live in Headington where there has alwasy been rate problems, many say due to the JR. Fortnightly waste collections can only exacerbate this problem!

Rob, Headington says...
10:02am Fri 2 Nov 07

Is the fact she's an academic relevant? If she happened to be a mechanic would the headline be 'mechanic in rat victory'?
Or perhaps you're using the word academic to suggest she has a greater knowledge than the rest of us of the necessity of weekly rubbish collections.
Of course she doesn't - she is just fitting some observations (i.e. she's heard rats in her house) to her prejudiced stance on weekly collections.
Let her run for the council elections, get elected and then see what she does. On a fixed council budget what is she going to vote to cut to enable restoration of weekly collections?

Why do we give these one issue NIMBYs the space?

J, Oxford says...
10:37am Fri 2 Nov 07

They could at least collect our recycling every week.

My recycle boxes are full after about 8 days, and because I don't have space for another 2 boxes (not practical in a flat), any excess rubbish has to go in the communal bins!

Hardly good for the environment!

Frances Kennett, says...
10:46am Fri 2 Nov 07

To Rob of Headington: I have no control over how the press titles me. I have argued this point on several occasions but it is a convention of the press to find a way of describing someone that they think works. I could be titled mother, pensioner, fundraiser, author, allotment digger,Ms or Miss! I have tried to get this changed but it has stuck.

John, Osney says...
10:48am Fri 2 Nov 07

I am delighted to see that Ms Kennett has been vindicated. It would be nice to see an apology to her from the "Portfolio Holder For A Cleaner City" who had apeared to me to suggest that Ms Kennett's problems were of her own making!
Sad to see the mess our lovely city is in. A well thought out scheme could easily combine weekly colections with higher recycling.
Like Dr Gasper I have to wonder who got us into the awful position of paying fines to the bloated EEC for filling up our own landfill sites. Madness indeed.

Frances Kennett, Jericho Oxford says...
10:52am Fri 2 Nov 07

To Dr Gasper, I know the rules come from the EU: but I do not take the view, 'poor councils'. They are elected to be our representatives and if their hands are tied then they have to take the problem back to government and fight for proper freedom of representation for us. This filthy system of collection system is impractical - I recycle everything I can and deny the charge that I am NIMBY about this. The whole of Oxford looks filthy and I am standing up for many others, not merely my small home.

Rob, Headington says...
11:08am Fri 2 Nov 07

You may not be a NIMBY in the strictest sense but you are banging on about a 'single issue'. Going back to weekly collections isn't cost neutral (Cllr Fooks estimates £750000pa) and a budget has to be adhered to - so what comes out to pay for it?
Oxford is dirty because a lot of people don't give a toss about what they do to their environment. That isn't the council's fault or even the EU's (EEC - where did that dinosaur creep out from?) but individuals.
Do we always tailor what we do to the lowest common denominator or try and strike a balance?

John, Osney says...
11:21am Fri 2 Nov 07

The figure of £750,000 is used by almost all councils as the cost of restoring weekly collections. It crops up over and over again.
It isn't a "costed cost" it is a scare figure.
Sixteen local authorities have reverted to weekly colections (and happy rate payers)......
I am a dinosaur and wish it was the European Economic comumunity and not the European super state or whatever. Note I also say "rates" not council tax. Dinosaurs do that!

J, Oxford says...
1:05pm Fri 2 Nov 07

Going back to weekly collections isn't cost neutral (Cllr Fooks estimates £750000pa)


It's not like we asked for a fortnightly collection, OR got a reduction in our CT bill!!!

Andrew, Oxford says...
2:29pm Fri 2 Nov 07

Good on you Ms K. And yes, it does mean something when an academic leads the fight instead of some of the more ordinary people who can't articulate their points in the same way. A working class person carries much less kudos...that's life and rightly so: those with knowldege "usually" have better brains adn pay more tax.

Andrew, Oxford says...
2:36pm Fri 2 Nov 07

...(contd)..
That said, I now phone the countil to make separate collections which makes me feel guilty for the extra mileage but they refuse to take away the rubbish we generate as a family.

For me, it's a game which I have tried to manage through bribing the binmen (£40 last year in cash got me 4 collections before they started to refuse again), calling the council will countless pleas to collecte the rubbish due to packaging that I can affect, nor the waste from two small children. So I'm left, once a month at least, also having to take the extra ribbish myself to the tip in my car with a fitted trailer. I then have to tip the recycling centre guy who refused to let me in until I gave him a tenner.

So, I pay £1600 CT a year, dump my own rubbish at my own expense, call the council all the time to demand extra waste be collected, wonder at whether the Gov will ever force companies to reduce their packaging (ever seen how much waste packaging there is in mussels in garlic sauce?).

Is it any wonder those without a trailer or the inclination or sense of community responsibility just dump it outside a neighbours house or in a ditch?

I despair.......

Your sayYourOxford

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Oxford Times account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
Dr Frances Kennett Dr Frances Kennett

Sponsored Links


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »